British lawmakers may make changes to 19th century libel laws that would make it less of a 'libel mecca,' reports the ABAJournal Law News Now. Here's an excerpt:
One member of the House of Lords is drafting a bill that could
especially deter forum shopping. It would require foreigners to show
that they've suffered actual harm in England before they are allowed to
sue there, the New York Times reports.
Unlike the United States, where the plaintiff must prove that a
statement is false in order to sue for libel, England puts the onus on
the defendant, who must establish that statements are true.
Lawmakers are responding to growing criticisms of the law from not
just media, but environmentalists, anti-corruption groups and others
who are being sued or threatened with legal action because of blog
posts.
Read the article here.
Posted by Jon Lutz