Contributing Editors

  • Anne Bardolph
    Acquisitions Librarian
    email

    Pat Bingham-Harper
    Cataloging Librarian
    email

    Margaret Clark
    Reference Librarian
    email

    Marin Dell
    Reference Librarian
    email

    Elizabeth Farrell
    Reference Librarian
    email

    Robin Gault
    Associate Director
    email

    Faye Jones
    Professor and Director of Law Library
    email

    Jon Lutz
    Electronic Services Librarian
    email

    Mary McCormick
    Assistant Director for Public Services
    email

    Trisha Simonds
    Reference Libriarian
    email

May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

The Physical Basis of Moral Judgments

Brain_and_moral_judgmentA recent study by Michael Koenigs, et al., Damage to the Prefrontal Cortex Increases Utilitarian Moral Judgments, published in the March 21, 2007 online version of Nature, demonstrates the effect of damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex on a person's ability to make normal judgments of right and wrongThe authors conclude that in "high-conflict personal moral dilemmas" which feature "competing considerations of aggregate welfare on the one hand, and, on the other hand, harm to others that would normally evoke a strong social emotion," participants in the study with focal bilateral damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPC), a brain region necessary for the normal generation of emotions, particularly 'social emotions,' appeared to "rely on explicit norms endorsing the maximization of aggregate welfare and prohibiting the harming of others."  According to an article by Benedict Carey in March 22, 2007, edition of The New York Times, p. A19, participants with "ventromedial injuries were about twice as likely as other participants to say they would push someone in front of the train (if that was the only option)..." Some of the questions asked of the study participants can be found in a March 22, 2007, article by Roxanne Khamsi at NewScientist.com

Posted by Mary McCormick

Complex Scientific Evidence

Gene therapies, gene transfers, genetic screening, and new biotechnologies will give rise to many legal disputes.  The legal issues are complex.  Are trial jurors prepared to deal with the complexities of these issues?  An article in Judicature, Genes and Justice: The Growing Impact of the New Genetics on the Courts discusses this issue and others.   

Posted by Jon Lutz

Careers in Forensic Psychology

Forensic Psychology is the application of science and psychology to questions and issues related to law and the legal system. Read more:
Careers in Forensic Psychology

Posted by Jon Lutz